Paper detail

Pair-breaking effect on mesoscopic persistent currents

We consider the contribution of superconducting fluctuations to the mesoscopic persistent current (PC) of an ensemble of normal metallic rings, made of a superconducting material whose low bare transition temperature $T^{0}_{c}$ is much smaller than the Thouless energy $E_{c}$. The effect of pair breaking is introduced via the example of magnetic impurities. We find that over a rather broad range of pair-breaking strength $\hbar/τ_{s}$, such that $T_c^0 \lesssim \hbar/τ_s \lesssim E_c$, the superconducting transition temperature is normalized down to minute values or zero while the PC is hardly affected. This may provide an explanation for the magnitude of the average PC's in copper and gold, as well as a way to determine their $T^0_c$'s. The dependence of the current and the dominant superconducting fluctuations on $E_cτ_s$ and on the ratio between $E_c$ and the temperature is analyzed. The measured PC's in copper (gold) correspond to $T^0_c$ of a few (a fraction of) mK.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.