Paper detail

Packing and Covering Properties of Subspace Codes for Error Control in Random Linear Network Coding

Codes in the projective space and codes in the Grassmannian over a finite field - referred to as subspace codes and constant-dimension codes (CDCs), respectively - have been proposed for error control in random linear network coding. For subspace codes and CDCs, a subspace metric was introduced to correct both errors and erasures, and an injection metric was proposed to correct adversarial errors. In this paper, we investigate the packing and covering properties of subspace codes with both metrics. We first determine some fundamental geometric properties of the projective space with both metrics. Using these properties, we then derive bounds on the cardinalities of packing and covering subspace codes, and determine the asymptotic rates of optimal packing and optimal covering subspace codes with both metrics. Our results not only provide guiding principles for the code design for error control in random linear network coding, but also illustrate the difference between the two metrics from a geometric perspective. In particular, our results show that optimal packing CDCs are optimal packing subspace codes up to a scalar for both metrics if and only if their dimension is half of their length (up to rounding). In this case, CDCs suffer from only limited rate loss as opposed to subspace codes with the same minimum distance. We also show that optimal covering CDCs can be used to construct asymptotically optimal covering subspace codes with the injection metric only.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.