p-capacity vs surface-area

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

This paper is devoted to exploring the relationship between the [1,n)∋p[1,n)\ni p-capacity and the surface-area in Rn≥2\mathbb R^{n\ge 2} which especially shows: if Ω⊂RnΩ\subset\mathbb R^n is a convex, compact, smooth set with its interior Ω∘≠∅Ω^\circ\not=\emptyset and the mean curvature H(∂Ω,⋅)>0H(\partialΩ,\cdot)>0 of its boundary ∂Ω\partialΩ then (n(p−1)p(n−1))p−1≤(capp(Ω)(p−1n−p)1−pσn−1)(area(∂Ω)σn−1)n−pn−1≤(∫∂Ω(H(∂Ω,⋅))n−1dσ(⋅)σn−1n−1)p−1∀p∈(1,n) \left(\frac{n(p-1)}{p(n-1)}\right)^{p-1}\le\frac{\left(\frac{\hbox{cap}_p(Ω)}{\big(\frac{p-1}{n-p}\big)^{1-p}σ_{n-1}}\right)}{\left(\frac{\hbox{area}(\partialΩ)}{σ_{n-1}}\right)^\frac{n-p}{n-1}}\le\left(\sqrt[n-1]{\int_{\partialΩ}\big(H(\partialΩ,\cdot)\big)^{n-1}\frac{dσ(\cdot)}{σ_{n-1}}}\right)^{p-1}\quad\forall\quad p\in (1,n) whose limits 1←p & p→n1\leftarrow p\ \&\ p\rightarrow n imply 1=cap1(Ω)area(∂Ω)  & ∫∂Ω(H(∂Ω,⋅))n−1dσ(⋅)σn−1≥1, 1=\frac{cap_1(Ω)}{\hbox{area}(\partialΩ)}\ \ \& \ \int_{\partialΩ}\big(H(\partialΩ,\cdot)\big)^{n-1}\frac{dσ(\cdot)}{σ_{n-1}}\ge 1, thereby not only discovering that the new best known constant is roughly half as far from the one conjectured by Pólya-Szegö in \cite[(2)]{P} but also extending the Pólya-Szegö inequality in \cite[(5)]{P}, with both the conjecture and the inequality being stated for the electrostatic capacity of a convex solid in R3\mathbb R^3.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.