Paper detail

Oxygen Abundances in Metal-Poor Stars (-2.2 < [Fe/H] < -1.2) from Infrared OH lines

Infrared OH lines at 1.55 - 1.56 um in the H-band were obtained with the Phoenix high-resolution spectrograph at the 2.1m telescope of the Kitt Peak National Observatory for a sample of 14 metal-poor stars. Detailed analyses of the sample stars have been carried out, deriving stellar parameters based on two methods: (a) spectroscopic parameters; (b) IRFM effective temperatures, trigonometric gravities and metallicities from Fe II lines. The Fe I lines present in the H-band region observed showed to be well fitted by the stellar parameters within $Δ$[Fe/H] < 0.15 dex. The oxygen abundances were derived from fits of spectrum synthesis calculations to the infrared OH lines. CO lines in the H- and K-bands were obtained for a subsample in order to determine their carbon abundances. Adopting the spectroscopic parameters a mean oxygen-to-iron ratio of [O/Fe] ~ +0.52 is obtained, whereas using the IRFM temperatures, Hipparcos gravities and [FeII/H], [O/Fe] ~ +0.25 is found. A mean of the two methods gives a final value of [O/Fe] ~ +0.4 for the metallicity range -2.2 < [Fe/H] < -1.2 of the sample metal-poor stars.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.