Paper detail

Overview and Issues of Experimental Observation of Microbunching Instabilities

The generation of the ultra-bright beams required by modern accelerators and drivers of free-electron lasers (FELs) has generally relied on chicane-based bunch compressions that often result in the microbunching instability. Following compression, spectral enhancements extend even into the visible wavelengths through the longitudinal space charge (LSC) impedances. Optical transition radiation (OTR) screens have been extensively used for transverse electron beam size measurements for the bright beams, but the presence of such longitudinal microstructures (microbunching) in the electron beam or the leading edge spikes can result in strong, localized coherent enhancements (COTR) that mask the actual beam profile. Generally, we have observed effects in rf photocathode (PC) injected linacs with chicane compressions since an R56 term is needed. In the past COTR had been only reported in S-band and L-band photoinjected based linacs with single or double bunch compression. Drive laser modulations and charge shot noise have been suspected of contributing to the cause. We now have evidence for the effects in both rf PC-gun injected linacs and thermionic- cathode (TC)-gun injected linacs (the latter do not involve a drive laser). Since the first observations, significant efforts have been made to characterize, model, and mitigate COTR effects on beam diagnostics. An update on the state-of-the-art for diagnosing these effects will be given as illustrated by examples at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS), Spring-8 Compact SASE Source (SCSS), Spring-8 Angstrom Compact Free Electron LAser (SACLA), Advanced Photon Source (APS), and the Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator (NLCTA). These observations continue to be of interest to the accelerator community.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.