Paper detail

Overshooting in simulations of compressible convection

(abridged) Context: Convective motions overshooting to regions that are formally convectively stable cause extended mixing. Aims: To determine the scaling of overshooting depth ($d_{\rm os}$) at the base of the convection zone as a function of imposed energy flux ($\mathscr{F}_{\rm n}$) and to estimate the extent of overshooting at the base of the solar convection zone. Methods: Three-dimensional Cartesian simulations of compressible non-rotating convection with unstable and stable layers are used. The simulations use either a fixed heat conduction profile or a temperature and density dependent formulation based on Kramers opacity law. The simulations cover a range of almost four orders of magnitude in the imposed flux. Results: A smooth heat conduction profile (either fixed or through Kramers opacity law) leads to a relatively shallow power law with $d_{\rm os}\propto \mathscr{F}_{\rm n}^{0.08}$ for low $\mathscr{F}_{\rm n}$. A fixed step-profile of the heat conductivity at the bottom of the convection zone leads to a somewhat steeper dependency with $d_{\rm os}\propto \mathscr{F}_{\rm n}^{0.12}$. Experiments with and without subgrid-scale entropy diffusion revealed a strong dependence on the effective Prandtl number which is likely to explain the steep power laws as a function of $\mathscr{F}_{\rm n}$ reported in the literature. Furthermore, changing the heat conductivity artificially below the convection zone is shown to lead to substantial underestimation of overshooting depth. Conclusions: Extrapolating from the results obtained with smooth heat conductivity profiles suggest that the overshooting depth for the solar flux is of the order of $0.2$ pressure scale heights at the base of the convection zone which is two to four times higher than estimates from helioseismology.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.