Paper detail

Overabundance of Calcium in the young SNR RX J0852$-$4622: evidence of over-production of $^{44}$Ti

Recently, COMPTEL has detected $γ$-rays of 1157 keV from $^{44}$Ti in the direction of the SNR RX J0852$-$4622 (Iyudin et al. 1998). Since $^{44}$Ti is a product of explosive nucleosynthesis and its half lifetime $τ\sb{1/2}$ is about 60 yrs, RX J0852$-$4622 must be a young supernova remnant and radiation is dominated by the ejecta rather than by interstellar matter. We have detected an X-ray emission line at $4.1\pm 0.2$ keV which is thought to come from highly ionized Ca. The emission line is so far only seen in the north-west shell region of RX J0852$-$4622. The X-ray spectrum can be well fitted with that of thin hot plasma of cosmic abundances except that of Ca, which is overabundant by a factor of $8 \pm 5$. Assuming that most of Ca is $^{44}$Ca, which originates from $^{44}$Ti by radioactive decay, we estimate a total Ca mass of about $1.1\times 10^{-3}M_\odot$. Combining the amount of $^{44}$Ca and the observed flux of the $^{44}$Ti $γ$-ray line, the age of RX J0852$-$4622 is around 1000 yrs.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.