Paper detail

Outflow Positivity Limiting for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. Part I: Framework and Recipe

Numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws are needed that efficiently mimic the constraints satisfied by exact solutions, including material conservation and positivity, while also maintaining high-order accuracy and numerical stability. Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) and WENO schemes allow efficient high-order accuracy while maintaining conservation. Positivity limiters developed by Zhang and Shu ensure a minimum time step for which positivity of cell average quantities is maintained without sacrificing conservation or formal accuracy; this is achieved by linearly damping the deviation from the cell average just enough to enforce a cell positivity condition that requires positivity at boundary nodes and strategically chosen interior points. We assume that the set of positive states is convex; it follows that positivity is equivalent to scalar positivity of a collection of affine functionals. Based on this observation, we generalize the method of Zhang and Shu to a framework that we call outflow positivity limiting: First, enforce positivity at boundary nodes. If wave speed desingularization is needed, cap wave speeds at physically justified maxima by using remapped states to calculate fluxes. Second, apply linear damping again to cap the boundary average of all positivity functionals at the maximum possible (relative to the cell average) for a scalar-valued representation positive in each mesh cell. This be done by enforcing positivity of the retentional, an affine combination of the cell average and the boundary average, in the same way that Zhang and Shu would enforce positivity at a single point (and with similar computational expense). Third, limit the time step so that cell outflow is less than the initial cell content. This framework guarantees essentially the same positivity-preserving time step as is guaranteed if positivity is enforced at every point in the mesh cell.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.