Paper detail

Outer Bounds on the Storage-Repair Bandwidth Tradeoff of Exact-Repair Regenerating Codes

In this paper, three outer bounds on the normalized storage-repair bandwidth (S-RB) tradeoff of regenerating codes having parameter set $\{(n,k,d),(α,β)\}$ under the exact-repair (ER) setting are presented. The first outer bound is applicable for every parameter set $(n,k,d)$ and in conjunction with a code construction known as {\em improved layered codes}, it characterizes the normalized ER tradeoff for the case $(n,k=3,d=n-1)$. It establishes a non-vanishing gap between the ER and functional-repair (FR) tradeoffs for every $(n,k,d)$. The second bound is an improvement upon an existing bound due to Mohajer et al. and is tighter than the first bound, in a regime away from the Minimum Storage Regeneraing (MSR) point. The third bound is for the case of $k=d$, under the linear setting. This outer bound matches with the achievable region of {\em layered codes} thereby characterizing the normalized ER tradeoff of linear ER codes when $k=d=n-1$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.