Paper detail

Oscillations of 2D ESTER models. I. The adiabatic case

Recent numerical and theoretical considerations have shown that low-degree acoustic modes in rapidly rotating stars follow an asymptotic formula and recent observations of pulsations in rapidly rotating delta Scuti stars seem to match these expectations. However, a key question is whether strong gradients or discontinuities can adversely affect this pattern to the point of hindering its identification. Other important questions are how rotational splittings are affected by the 2D rotation profiles expected from baroclinic effects and whether it is possible to probe the rotation profile using these splittings. Accordingly, we numerically calculate pulsation modes in continuous and discontinuous rapidly rotating models produced by the 2D ESTER (Evolution STEllaire en Rotation) code. This spectral multi-domain code self-consistently calculates the rotation profile based on baroclinic effects and allows us to introduce discontinuities without loss of numerical accuracy. Pulsations are calculated using an adiabatic version of the Two-dimensional Oscillation Program (TOP) code. The variational principle is used to confirm the high accuracy of the pulsation frequencies and to derive an integral formula that closely matches the generalised rotational splittings, except when modes are involved in avoided crossings. This potentially allows us to probe the the rotation profile using inverse theory. Acoustic glitch theory, applied along the island mode orbit deduced from ray dynamics, can correctly predict the periodicity of the glitch frequency pattern produced by a discontinuity or the Gamma1 dip related to the He II ionisation zone in some of the models. The asymptotic frequency pattern remains sufficiently well preserved to potentially allow its detection in observed stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.