Paper detail

Oscillating monopole-antimonopole pair in the Weinberg-Salam model

We investigate further the properties of axially symmetrical monopole-antimonopole pair in the standard Weinberg-Salam theory. These numerical solutions behave quite differently from their counterparts in the SU(2) Yang-Mills-Higgs theory as the poles are now bounded by a flux string. Our results confirm that the energy of these solutions resides in a range of 13.17 - 21.02 TeV. In addition, we found strong evidence suggesting this configuration is time-dependent and discovered an energy oscillation phenomenon between the monopole and anti-monopole, which is associated with the symmetry of the solution. Finally, we calculate numerically the magnetic charge of the solution and confirm that its value is indeed $\frac{4π}{e}\sin^2θ_{\scalebox{.5} {W}}$, as predicted by Y. Nambu in the 1970s. Counterintuitively, the magnetic charge is spread out and distributed along the string instead of concentrated near the poles.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.