Paper detail

Ornstein-Uhlenbeck parameter extraction from light curves of Fermi-LAT observed blazars

Context. Monthly-binned gamma-ray light curves of 236 bright gamma-ray sources, particularly blazars, selected from a sample of 2278 high-galactic latitude objects observed with Fermi-LAT, show flux variability characterized by power spectral densities consisting of a single power-law component, ranging from Brownian to white noise. Aims. The main goal here is to assess the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) model by studying the range of its three parameters that reproduces these statistical properties. Methods. We develop procedures for extracting values of the three OU model parameters (mean flux, correlation length, and random amplitude) from time series data, and apply them to compare numerical integrations of the OU process with the Fermi-LAT data. Results. The OU process fully describes the statistical properties of the flux variations of the 236 blazars. The distributions of the extracted OU parameters are narrowly peaked about well-defined values (sigma, mu, theta) = (0.2, -8.4, 0.5) with variances (0.004, 0.07, 0.13). The distributions of rise and decay time scales of flares in the numerical simulations, i.e. major flux variations fulfilling pre-defined criteria, are in agreement with the observed ones. The power spectral densities of the synthetic light curves are statistically indistinguishable from those of the measured light curves. Conclusions. Long-term gamma-ray flux variability of blazars on monthly time scales is well described by a stochastic model involving only three parameters. The methods described here are powerful tools to study randomness in light curves and thereby constrain the physical mechanisms responsible for the observed flux variations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.