Paper detail

Origins of the H, He I, and Ca II Line Emission in Classical T Tauri Stars

We perform local excitation calculations to obtain line opacities and emissivity ratios and compare them with observed properties of H, He I, O I, Ca II, and Na I lines to determine the density, temperature, and photon ionization rate. We find that UV photoionization is the most probable excitation mechanism for generating the He I 10830 opacities that produce all the associated absorption features. We also calculate the specific line flux at an observed velocity of v_obs = +/- 150 km/s for both radial wind and infall models. All the model results, together with observed correlations between absorption and emission features and between narrow and broad emission components, are used to deduce the origins of the strong H, He I, and Ca II broad line emission. We conclude that the first two arise primarily in a radial outflow that is highly clumpy. The bulk of the wind volume is filled by gas at a density ~10^9 cm^-3 and optically thick to He I 10830 and H alpha, but optically thin to He I 5876, Pa gamma, and the Ca II infrared triplet. The optically thick He I 5876 emission occurs mostly in regions of density greater than or equal to 10^11 cm^-3 and temperature greater than or equal to 1.5x10^4 K, while the optically thick H alpha and Pa gamma emission occur mostly in regions of density around 10^11 cm^-3 and temperature between 8750 and 1.25x10^4 K. In producing the observed line fluxes at a given v_obs, the covering factor of these emission clumps is sufficiently small not to incur significant absorption of the stellar and veiling continua in either He I or H lines. The strong Ca II broad line emission likely arises in both the magnetospheric accretion flow and the disk boundary layer, where the gases dissipate part of their rotational energies before infalling along magnetic field lines. The needed density and temperature are ~10^12 cm^-3 and less than or equal to 7500 K.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.