Paper detail

Origin of Multiple Infection Waves in a Pandemic: Effects of Inherent Susceptibility and External Infectivity Distributions

Two factors that are often ignored but could play a crucial role in the progression of an infectious disease are the distributions of inherent susceptibility ($σ_{inh}$) and external infectivity ($ι_{ext}$), in a given population. While the former is determined by the immunity of an individual towards a disease, the latter depends on the duration of exposure to the infection. We model the spatio-temporal propagation of a pandemic using a generalized SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Removed) model by introducing the susceptibility and infectivity distributions to understand their combined effects, which appear to remain inadequately addressed till date. We consider the coupling between $σ_{inh}$ and $ι_{ext}$ through a new Critical Infection Parameter (CIP) ($γ_c$). We find that the neglect of these distributions, as in the naive SIR model, results in an overestimation of the amount of infection in a population, which leads to incorrect (higher) estimates of the infections required to achieve the herd immunity threshold. Additionally, we include the effects of seeding of infection in a population by long-range migration. We solve the resulting master equations by performing Kinetic Monte Carlo Cellular Automata (KMC-CA) simulations. Importantly, our simulations can reproduce the multiple infection peak scenario of a pandemic. The latent interactions between disease migration and the distributions of susceptibility and infectivity can render the progression a character vastly different from the naive SIR model. In particular, inclusion of these additional features renders the problem a character of a living percolating system where the disease cluster survives by migrating from region to region.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.