Paper detail

Origin of Molecular Outflow Determined from Thermal Dust Polarization

The observational expectation of polarization measurements of thermal dust radiation is investigated to find information on molecular outflows based on magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) and radiation transfer simulations. There are two major proposed models for the driving of molecular outflows: (1) molecular gas is accelerated by a magnetic pressure gradient or magnetocentrifugal wind mechanism before the magnetic field and molecular gas are decoupled, (2) the linear momentum of a highly collimated jet is transferred to the ambient molecular gas. In order to distinguish between these two models, it is crucial to observe the configuration of the magnetic field. An observation of a toroidal magnetic field is strong evidence that the first of the models is appropriate. In this paper, we calculated the polarization distribution of thermal dust radiation due to the alignment of dust grains along the magnetic field using molecular outflow data calculated by two-dimensional axisymmetric MHD simulations. An asymmetric distribution around the z-axis is characteristic for magnetic fields composed of both poloidal and toroidal components. We determined that the outflow has a low polarization degree compared with the envelope and that the envelope and outflow have different polarization directions (B-vector), namely, the magnetic field within the envelope is parallel to the global magnetic field lines while the magnetic field of the outflow is perpendicular to it. Thus we have demonstrated that the point-symmetric (rather than axisymmetric) distributions of low polarization regions indicate that molecular outflows are likely to be magnetically driven. Observations of this polarization distribution with tools such as ALMA would confirm the origin of the molecular outflow.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.