Paper detail

Origin of Dust around V1309 Sco

The origin of dust grains in the interstellar medium is still open problem. \cite{Nicholls2013} found the presence of a significant amount of dust around V1309 Sco which maybe originate from the merger of a contact binary. We investigate the origin of dust around V1309 Sco, and suggest that these dust grains are efficiently produced in the binary-merger ejecta. By means of \emph{AGBDUST} code, we estimate that $\sim 5.2\times10^{-4} M_\odot$ of dust grains are produced, and their radii are $\sim 10^{-5}$ cm. These dust grains mainly are composed of silicate and iron grains. Because the mass of the binary-merger ejecta is very small, the contribution of dust produced by binary-merger ejecta to the overall dust production in the interstellar medium is negligible. However, it is the most important that the discovery of a significant amount of dust around V1309 Sco offers a direct support for the idea---common-envelope ejecta provides an ideal environment for dust formation and growth. Therefore, we confirm that common-envelope ejecta can be important source of cosmic dust.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.