Paper detail

Origin of craters on Phoebe: comparison with Cassini's data

Phoebe is one of the irregular satellites of Saturn; the images taken by Cassini-Huygens spacecraft allowed us to analyze its surface and the craters on it. We study the craters on Phoebe produced by Centaur objects from the Scattered Disk (SD) and plutinos escaped from the 3:2 mean motion resonance with Neptune and compare our results with the observations by Cassini. We use previous simulations on trans-Neptunian Objects and a method that allows us to obtain the number of craters and the cratering rate on Phoebe. We obtain the number of craters and the greatest crater on Phoebe produced by Centaurs in the present configuration of the Solar System. Moreover, we obtain a present normalized rate of encounters of Centaurs with Saturn of $\dot F = 7.1 \times 10^{-11}$ per year, from which we can infer the current cratering rate on Phoebe for each crater diameter. Our study and the comparison with the observations suggest that the main crater features on Phoebe are unlikely to have been produced in the present configuration of the Solar System and that they must have been acquired when the SD were depleted in the early Solar System. If this is what happened and the craters were produced when Phoebe was a satellite of Saturn, then it had to be captured, very early in the evolution of the Solar System.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.