Paper detail

Origin and Evolution of the Abundance Gradient along the Milky Way Disk

Based on a simple model of the chemical evolution of the Milky Way disk, we investigate the disk oxygen abundance gradient and its time evolution. Two star formation rates (SFRs) are considered, one is the classical Kennicutt-Schmidt law ($ Ψ= 0.25 Σ_{\rm{gas}}^{1.4}$, hereafter C-KS law), another is the modified Kennicutt law ($Ψ= αΣ_{\rm{gas}}^{1.4} ({V/r})$, hereafter M-KS law). In both cases, the model can produce some amount of abundance gradient, and the gradient is steeper in the early epoch of disk evolution. However, we find that when C-KS law is adopted, the classical chemical evolution model, which assumes a radial dependent infall time scale, cannot produce a sufficiently steep present-day abundance gradient. This problem disappears if we introduce a disk formation time scale, which means that at early times, infalling gas cools down onto the inner disk only, while the outer disk forms later. This kind of model, however, will predict a very steep gradient in the past. When the M-KS law is adopted, the model can properly predict both the current abundance gradient and its time evolution, matching recent observations from planetary nebulae and open clusters along the Milky Way disk. Our best model also predicts that outer disk (artificially defined as the disk with $R_g \ge 8kpc$) has a steeper gradient than the inner disk. The observed outer disk gradients from Cepheids, open clusters and young stars show quite controversial results. There are also some hints from Cepheids that the outer disk abundance gradient may have a bimodal distribution. More data is needed in order to clarify the outer disk gradient problem. Our model calculations show that for an individual Milky Way-type galaxy, a better description of the local star formation is the modified KS law.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.