Paper detail

Oriented percolation in a random environment

On the lattice $\widetilde{\mathbb Z}^2_+:={(x,y)\in \mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z_+\colon x+y \text{is even}}$ we consider the following oriented (northwest-northeast) site percolation: the lines $H_i:={(x,y)\in \widetilde {\mathbb Z}^2_+ \colon y=i}$ are first declared to be bad or good with probabilities $\de$ and $1-\de$ respectively, independently of each other. Given the configuration of lines, sites on good lines are open with probability $p_{_G}>p_c$, the critical probability for the standard oriented site percolation on $\mathbb Z_+ \times \mathbb Z_+$, and sites on bad lines are open with probability $p_{_B}$, some small positive number, independently of each other. We show that given any pair $p_{_G}>p_c$ and $p_{_B}>0$, there exists a $δ(p_{_G}, p_{_B})>0$ small enough, so that for $δ\le δ(p_G,p_B)$ there is a strictly positive probability of oriented percolation to infinity from the origin.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.