Paper detail

Order statistics of the early-type galaxy luminosity function

We apply order statistics (OS) to the bright end ($M_r < -22$) of the luminosity distribution of early-type galaxies spectroscopically identified in the SDSS DR7 catalog. We calculate the typical OS quantities of this distribution numerically, measuring the expectation value and variance of the $k^{th}$ most luminous galaxy in a sample with cardinality $N$ over a large ensemble of such samples. From these statistical quantities we explain why and in what limit the $k^{th}$ most luminous galaxies can be used as standard candles for cosmological studies. Since our sample contains all bright galaxies including the brightest cluster galaxies (BCG), based on OS we argue that BCGs can be considered as statistical extremes of a well-established Schechter luminosity distribution when galaxies are binned by redshift and not cluster-by-cluster. We presume that the reason behind this might be that luminous red ellipticals in galaxy clusters are \em not random \em samples of an overall luminosity distribution but biased by the fact that they are in a cluster containing the BCG. We show that a simple statistical toy model can reproduce the well-known magnitude gap between the BCG and the second brightest galaxy of the clusters.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.