Paper detail

Order-Optimal Rate of Caching and Coded Multicasting with Random Demands

We consider the canonical {\em shared link network} formed by a source node, hosting a library of $m$ information messages (files), connected via a noiseless common link to $n$ destination nodes (users), each with a cache of size M files. Users request files at random and independently, according to a given a-priori demand distribution $\qv$. A coding scheme for this network consists of a caching placement (i.e., a mapping of the library files into the user caches) and delivery scheme (i.e., a mapping for the library files and user demands into a common multicast codeword) such that, after the codeword transmission, all users can retrieve their requested file. The rate of the scheme is defined as the {\em average} codeword length normalized with respect to the length of one file, where expectation is taken over the random user demands. For the same shared link network, in the case of deterministic demands, the optimal min-max rate has been characterized within a uniform bound, independent of the network parameters. In particular, fractional caching (i.e., storing file segments) and using linear network coding has been shown to provide a min-max rate reduction proportional to 1/M with respect to standard schemes such as unicasting or "naive" uncoded multicasting. The case of random demands was previously considered by applying the same order-optimal min-max scheme separately within groups of files requested with similar probability. However, no order-optimal guarantee was provided for random demands under the average rate performance criterion. In this paper, we consider the random demand setting and provide general achievability and converse results. In particular, we consider a family of schemes that combine random fractional caching according to a probability distribution $\pv$ that depends on the demand distribution $\qv$, with a linear coded delivery scheme based on ...

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.