Paper detail

Orbital upper critical field and its anisotropy of clean one- and two-band superconductors

The Helfand-Werthamer (HW) scheme\cite{HW} of evaluating the orbital upper critical field is generalized to anisotropic superconductors in general, and to two-band clean materials, in particular. Our formal procedure differs from those in the literature; it reproduces not only the isotropic HW limit, but also the results of calculations for the two-band superconducting MgB$_2$\cite{MMK,DS} along with the existing data on $H_{c2}(T)$ and its anisotropy $γ(T)=H_{c2,ab}(T)/H_{c2,c}(T)$ ($a,c$ are the principal directions of a uniaxial crystal). Using rotational ellipsoids as model Fermi surfaces we apply the formalism developed to study $γ(T)$ for a few different anisotropies of the Fermi surface and of the order parameters. We find that even for a single band d-wave order parameter $γ(T)$ decreases on warming, however, relatively weakly. For order parameters of the form $ Δ(k_z) = Δ_0(1+η\cos k_za)$,\cite{Xu} according to our simulations $γ(T)$ may either increase or decrease on warming even for a single band depending on the sign of $η$. Hence, the common belief that the multi-band Fermi surface is responsible for the temperature variation of $γ$ is proven incorrect.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.