Paper detail

Orbital structure of merger remnants: Trends with gas fraction in 1:1 mergers

Since the violent relaxation in hierarchical merging is incomplete, elliptical galaxies retain a wealth of information about their formation pathways in their present-day orbital structure. A variety of evidence indicates that gas-rich major mergers play an important role in the formation of elliptical galaxies. We simulate 1:1 disk mergers at seven different initial gas fractions ranging from 0 to 40%, using the TreeSPH code Gadget-2. We classify the stellar orbits in each remnant and construct radial profiles of the orbital content, intrinsic shape, and orientation. The dissipationless remnants are typically prolate-triaxial, dominated by box orbits within r_c ~ 1.5Reff, and by tube orbits in their outer parts. As the gas fraction increases, the box orbits within r_c are increasingly replaced by a population of short axis tubes (z-tubes) with near zero net rotation, and the remnants become progressively more oblate and round. The long axis tube (x-tube) orbits are highly streaming and relatively insensitive to the gas fraction, implying that their angular momentum is retained from the dynamically cold initial conditions. Outside r_c, the orbital structure is essentially unchanged by the gas. The 15-20% gas remnants often display disk-like kinematically distinct cores (KDCs). These remnants show an interesting resemblance, in both their velocity maps and intrinsic orbital structure, to the KDC galaxy NGC4365 (van den Bosch et al. 2008). At 30-40% gas, the remnants are rapidly rotating, with sharp embedded disks on ~ 1Reff scales. We predict a characteristic, physically intuitive orbital structure for 1:1 disk merger remnants, with a distinct transition between 1 and 3Reff that will be readily observable with combined data from the 2D kinematics surveys SAURON and SMEAGOL.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.