Paper detail

Orbital Stability of Exomoons and Submoons with Applications to Kepler 1625b-I

An intriguing question in the context of dynamics arises: Could a moon possess a moon itself? Such a configuration does not exist in the Solar System, although this may be possible in theory. Kollmeier et al. (2019) determined the critical size of a satellite necessary to host a long-lived sub-satellite, or submoon. However, the orbital constraints for these submoons to exist are still undetermined. Domingos et al. (2006) indicated that moons are stable out to a fraction of the host planet Hill radius $R_{H,p}$, which in turn depends on the eccentricity of its host's orbit. Motivated by this, we simulate a system of exomoons and submoons for $10^5$ planetary orbits, while considering many initial orbital phases to obtain the critical semimajor axis in terms of $R_{H,p}$ or the hosts satellite's Hill radius $R_{H,sat}$, respectively. We find that, assuming circular coplanar orbits, the stability limit for exomoons is 0.40 $R_{H,p}$ and for a submoon is 0.33 $R_{H,sat}$. Additionally, we discuss the observational feasibility of detecting these sub-satellites through photometric, radial velocity, or direct imaging observations using the Neptunes-sized exomoon candidates Kepler 1625b-I (Teachey et al. 2018) and identify how stability can shape the identification of future candidates.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.