Paper detail

Orbital periods and Accretion disc structure of four AM CVn systems

Phase-resolved spectroscopy of four AM CVn systems obtained with the William Herschel Telescope and the Gran Telescopio de Canarias (GTC) is presented. SDSS\,J120841.96+355025.2 was found to have an orbital period of 52.96$\pm$0.40\,min and shows the presence of a second bright spot in the accretion disc. The average spectrum contains strong Mg\,{\sc i} and Si\,{\sc i/ii} absorption lines most likely originating in the atmosphere of the accreting white dwarf. SDSS\,J012940.05+384210.4 has an orbital period of 37.555$\pm$0.003 min. The average spectrum shows the Stark broadened absorption lines of the DB white dwarf accretor. The orbital period is close to the previously reported superhump period of 37.9\,min. Combined, this results in a period excess $ε$=0.0092$\pm$0.0054 and a mass ratio $q=0.031\pm$0.018. SDSS\,J164228.06+193410.0 displays an orbital period of 54.20$\pm$1.60\,min with an alias at 56.35\,min. The average spectrum also shows strong Mg\,{\sc i} absorption lines, similar to SDSS\,J120841.96+355025.2. SDSS\,J152509.57+360054.50 displays an period of 44.32$\pm$0.18\,min. The overall shape of the average spectrum is more indicative of shorter period systems in the 20-35 minute range. The accretor is still clearly visible in the pressure broadened absorption lines most likely indicating a hot donor star and/or a high mass accretor. Flux ratios for several helium lines were extracted from the Doppler tomograms for the disc and bright spot region, and compared with single-slab LTE models with variable electron densities and path lengths to estimate the disc and bright spot temperature. A good agreement between data and the model in three out of four systems was found for the disc region. All three systems show similar disc temperatures of $\sim$10\,500 K. In contrast, only weak agreement between observation and models was found for the bright spot region.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.