Paper detail

Orbital motions and the conservation-law/preferred-frame $α_3$ parameter

We analytically calculate some orbital effects induced by the Lorentz-invariance/momentum-conservation PPN parameter $α_3$ in a gravitationally bound binary system made of a compact primary orbited by a test particle. We neither restrict ourselves to any particular orbital configuration nor to specific orientations of the primary's spin axis $\boldsymbol{\hatψ}$. We use our results to put preliminary upper bounds on $α_3$ in the weak-field regime by using the latest data from Solar System's planetary dynamics. By linearly combining the supplementary perihelion precessions $Δ\dot\varpi$ of the Earth, Mars and Saturn, determined with the EPM2011 ephemerides, we infer $|α_3|\lesssim 6\times 10^{-10}$. Our result is about 3 orders of magnitude better than the previous weak-field constraints existing in the literature, and of the same order of magnitude of the bound expected from the future BepiColombo mission to Mercury. It is, by construction, independent of the other preferred-frame PPN parameters $α_1,α_2$, both preliminarily constrained down to a $\approx 10^{-6}$ level. The wide pulsar-white dwarf binary PSR J0407+1607 yields a preliminary upper bound on the strong-field version $\hatα_3$ of the Lorentz-invariance/momentum-conservation PPN parameter of the order of $3\times 10^{-17}$. It relies upon certain assumptions on the unknown values of the pulsar's spin axis orientation $\boldsymbol{\hatψ}$, the orbital node $Ω$ and the inclination $I$. Neither the pulsar's proper motion, still undetected, nor a possible value of the pulsar's mass $m_{\rm p}$ up to two solar masses substantially affect our result.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.