Paper detail

Orbital Magnetization in Solids: Boundary contributions as a non-Hermitian effect

The theory of orbital magnetization is reconsidered by defining additional quantities that incorporate a non-Hermitian effect due to anomalous operators that break the domain of definition of the Hermitian Hamiltonian. As a result, boundary contributions to the observable are rigorously and analytically taken into account. In this framework, we extend the standard velocity operator definition in order to incorporate an anomaly of the position operator that is inherent in band theory, which results in an explicit boundary velocity contribution. Using the extended velocity, we define the electrons' intrinsic orbital circulation and we argue that this is the main quantity that captures the orbital magnetization phenomenon. As evidence of this assertion, we demonstrate the explicit relation between the nth band electrons' collective intrinsic circulation and the approximated, evaluated with respect to Wannier states, local and itinerant circulation contributions that are frequently used in the modern theory of orbital magnetization. A quantum mechanical formalism for the orbital magnetization of extended and periodic topological solids (insulators or metals) is redeveloped without any Wannier localization approximation or heuristic extension [Caresoli, Thonhauser, Vanderbilt and Resta, Phys. Rev. B 74, 024408 (2006)]. It is rigorously shown that, as a result of the non-Hermitian effect, an emerging covariant derivative enters the one-band (adiabatically deformed) approximation k-space expression for the orbital magnetization. In the corresponding many-band (unrestricted) k-space formula, the non-Hermitian effect contributes an additional boundary quantity which is expected to give locally (in momentum space) giant contributions whenever band crossings occur along with Hall voltage due to imbalance of electron accumulation at the opposite boundaries of the material.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.