Paper detail

Orbital eccentricity of WASP-12 and WASP-14 from new radial-velocity monitoring with SOPHIE

As part of the long-term radial velocity monitoring of known transiting planets -- designed to measure orbital eccentricities, spin-orbit alignments and further planetary companions -- we have acquired radial velocity data for the two transiting systems WASP-12 and WASP-14, each harbouring gas giants on close orbits (orbital period of 1.09 and 2.24 days respectively). In both cases, the initial orbital solution suggested a significant orbital eccentricity, 0.049+-0.015 for WASP-12 and 0.091+-0.003 for WASP-14. Since then, measurements of the secondary eclipse of WASP-12 in the infrared have indicated that one projection of the eccentricity (e cos w) was very close to zero, casting doubt on the eccentricity from the initial radial velocity orbit. Our measurements confirm that the initial eccentricity detection could be spurious, and show that the radial velocity data is compatible with a circular orbit. A MCMC analysis taking into account the presence of correlated systematic noise in both the radial velocity and photometric data gives e=0.017 (+0.015-0.011). By contrast, we confirm the orbital eccentricity of WASP-14, and refine its value to e=0.088+-0.003. WASP-14 is thus the closest presently known planet with a confirmed eccentric orbit.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.