Paper detail

Orbital and Spin Phase-Resolved Spectroscopy of the Intermediate Polar EX Hya Using XMM-Newton Data

We present for the first time orbital phase-resolved spectra of an intermediate polar (IP), EX Hya, together with the spin phase-resolved spectra during two different epochs using the X-ray Multi-Mirror Mission, European Photon Imaging Camera (pn instrument). We find that the source at the two epochs has the same X-ray luminosity of $\sim$ 6.5 $\times$ 10$^{31}$ erg s$^{-1}$. We detect spectral variations between the 2000 and 2003 observations of the source. We fitted the spectrum using a neutral hydrogen absorption model with or without covering fraction together with Gaussians for emission lines, two collisional equilibrium plasma emission models (MEKAL) and a cooling-flow plasma emission model (VMCFLOW). We find that two of the three emission components ($kT$=0.6-0.8 keV and $kT$=1.3-1.7 keV) fitted by the MEKAL models are almost constant over the spin and orbital phases and also over the two different epochs with the normalisation varying directly proportional to the flux when the data are folded according to the orbital and spin phase indicating that the slight variation may be due to occultation. The emission modeled by the VMCFLOW changes over the spin and orbital phases and the 2000 and 2003 observations reveal two different ranges of temperatures (3-33 and 8-61 keV respectively) that model the shock zone in the accretion column/s. The ratios of the spin maximum to minimum and the orbital maximum to minimum spectra along with the increase in the plasma temperatures indicate that the spectrum gets harder in the minimum phases of both orbital and spin periods. In the 2003 observation, a 6.4 keV fluorescent Fe emission line is present at the orbital minima in a range of phases from 0.9 to 1.3 and it is absent otherwise. This indicates that there is reflection from the disc most likely from a large bulge at the accretion impact zone.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.