Paper detail

Option Pricing and CVA Calculations using the Monte Carlo-Tree (MC-Tree) Method

The binomial tree method and the Monte Carlo (MC) method are popular methods for solving option pricing problems. However in both methods there is a trade-off between accuracy and speed of computation, both of which are important in applications. We introduce a new method, the MC-Tree method, that combines the MC method with the binomial tree method. It employs a mixing distribution on the tree parameters, which are restricted to give prescribed mean and variance. For the family of mixing densities proposed here, the corresponding compound densities of the tree outcomes at final time are obtained. Ideally the compound density would be (after a logarithmic transformation of the asset prices) Gaussian. Using the fact that in general, when mean and variance are prescribed, the maximum entropy distribution is Gaussian, we look for mixing densities for which the corresponding compound density has high entropy level. The compound densities that we obtain are not exactly Gaussian, but have entropy values close to the maximum possible Gaussian entropy. Furthermore we introduce techniques to correct for the deviation from the ideal Gaussian pricing measure. One of these (distribution correction technique) ensures that expectations calculated with the method are taken with respect to the desired Gaussian measure. The other one (bias-correction technique) ensures that the probability distributions used are risk-neutral in each of the trees. Apart from option pricing, we apply our techniques to develop an algorithm for calculation of the Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) to the price of an American option. Numerical examples of the workings of the MC-Tree approach are provided, which show good performance in terms of accuracy and computational speed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.