Paper detail

Optimizing Safe Flow Decompositions in DAGs

Network flow is one of the most studied combinatorial optimization problems having innumerable applications. Any flow on a directed acyclic graph $G$ having $n$ vertices and $m$ edges can be decomposed into a set of $O(m)$ paths. In some applications, each solution (decomposition) corresponds to some particular data that generated the original flow. Given the possibility of multiple optimal solutions, no optimization criterion ensures the identification of the correct decomposition. Hence, recently flow decomposition was studied [RECOMB22] in the Safe and Complete framework, particularly for RNA Assembly. They presented a characterization of the safe paths, resulting in an $O(mn+out_R)$ time algorithm to compute all safe paths, where $out_R$ is the size of the raw output reporting each safe path explicitly. They also showed that $out_R$ can be $Ω(mn^2)$ in the worst case but $O(m)$ in the best case. Hence, they further presented an algorithm to report a concise representation of the output $out_C$ in $O(mn+out_C)$ time, where $out_C$ can be $Ω(mn)$ in the worst case but $O(m)$ in the best case. In this work, we study how different safe paths interact, resulting in optimal output-sensitive algorithms requiring $O(m+out_R)$ and $O(m+out_C)$ time for computing the existing representations of the safe paths. Further, we propose a new characterization of the safe paths resulting in the {\em optimal} representation of safe paths $out_O$, which can be $Ω(mn)$ in the worst case but requires optimal $O(1)$ space for every safe path reported, with a near-optimal computation algorithm. Overall we further develop the theory of safe and complete solutions for the flow decomposition problem, giving an optimal algorithm for the explicit representation, and a near-optimal algorithm for the optimal representation of the safe paths

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.