Paper detail

Optimization of the image contrast in SPECT-CT bremsstrahlung imaging for Selective Internal Radiation Therapy of liver malignancies with Y-90 microspheres

The quality of SPECT Bremsstrahlung images of patients treated with Y-90 is poor, mainly because of scattered radiation and collimator septa penetration. To minimize the latter effect, High Energy (HE) or Medium Energy (ME) collimators can be used. Scatter correction is not possible through the methods commonly used for the diagnostic radionuclides (Tc-99m, etc.) because the Bremsstrahlung radiation does not have distinct photopeaks, but a broad spectrum of energies ranging from zero to the maximum one detectable by the gamma-camera crystal is registered. Scatter radiation and collimator septa penetration affect the Contrast and the Contrast Recovery Coefficient (CRC) : our research focused on finding the best energy position for the acquisition window in order to maximize these parameters. To be guided in this finding, we first made a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of a SPECT acquisition of a Y-90 cylindrical phantom and then we measured at different energies the Line Spread Function (LSF) of a linear Y-90 source inserted in a scatter medium. Finally we acquired the NEMA IEC Body phantom filled with Y-90 chloride at different energies and using different setups in order to measure the Contrast and the CRC in different conditions with the purpose of optimizing the clinical SPECT acquisition procedures. The final results showed that Contrast and CRC are higher for HE collimators compared to ME collimators and they have a maximum for the larger spheres at 110 - 135 keV.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.