Paper detail

Optimization of Survey Strategies for Detecting Slow Radio Transients

We investigate the optimal tradeoff between sensitivity and field of view in surveys for slow radio transients using the event detection rate as the survey metric. We investigate (i) a survey in which the events are distributed homogeneously throughout a volume centred on the Earth, (ii) a survey in which the events are homogeneously distributed, but are only detectable beyond a certain minimum distance, and (iii) a survey in which all the events occur at an identical distance, as is appropriate for a targetted survey of a particular field which subtends N_point telescope pointings. For a survey of fixed duration, T_obs, we determine the optimal tradeoff between number of telescope pointings, N, and integration time per field. We consider a population in which the event luminosity distribution follows a power law with index -α, and t_slew is the slewing time between fields or, for a drift scan, the time taken for the telescope drift by one beamwidth. Several orders of magnitude improvement in detection rate is possible by optimization of the survey parameters. The optimal value of N for case (i) is N_max ~ T_obs/4 t_slew, while for case (iii) we find N_max = (L_max/L_0)^2 [ (3 -α)/2 ]^{2/(α-1)}, where L_max is the maximum luminosity of a transient event and L_0 is the minimum luminosity event detectable in an integration of duration T_obs. For a telescope field of view, Ω, and a minimum detectable flux density, S_0, the detection rate scales as N ΩS_0^{-3/2} for homogeneously distributed events, while for targetted events (iii) it scales as N ΩS_0^{1-α}. The quantity ΩS_0^{-2} is often used as the metric of telescope performance in the SKA transients literature, but only under special circumstances is it the metric that optimizes the event detection rate. [abstract abbreviated]

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.