Paper detail

Optimization and Validation of Diffusion MRI-based Fiber Tracking with Neural Tracer Data as a Reference

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) allows non-invasive investigation of whole-brain connectivity, which can potentially help to reveal the brain's global network architecture and abnormalities involved in neurological and mental disorders. However, the reliability of connection inferences from dMRI-based fiber tracking is still debated, due to low sensitivity, dominance of false positives, and inaccurate and incomplete reconstruction of long-range connections. Furthermore, parameters of tracking algorithms are typically tuned in a heuristic way, which leaves room for manipulation of an intended result. Here we propose a data-driven framework to optimize and validate parameters of dMRI-based fiber-tracking algorithms using neural tracer data as a reference. Japan's Brain/MINDS Project provides invaluable datasets containing both dMRI and neural tracer data from the same primates. We considered four criteria for goodness of fiber tracking: distance-weighted coverage, true/false positive ratio, projection coincidence, and commissural passage, applied using a multi-objective optimization algorithm. We implemented a variant of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to optimize five major parameters of a global fiber-tracking algorithm over multiple brain samples in parallel. Using optimized parameters compared to the default parameters, dMRI-based fiber tracking performance was significantly improved, while minimizing false positives and impossible cross-hemisphere connections. Parameters optimized for 10 tracer injection sites showed good generalization capability for other brain samples. These results demonstrate the importance of data-driven adjustment of fiber-tracking algorithms and support the validity of dMRI-based tractography, if appropriate adjustments are employed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.