Paper detail

Optimised sensitivity to leptonic CP violation from spectral information: the LBNO case at 2300 km baseline

One of the main goals of the Long Baseline Neutrino Observatory (LBNO) is to study the $L/E$ behaviour (spectral information) of the electron neutrino and antineutrino appearance probabilities, in order to determine the unknown CP-violation phase $δ_{CP}$ and discover CP-violation in the leptonic sector. The result is based on the measurement of the appearance probabilities in a broad range of energies, covering t he 1st and 2nd oscillation maxima, at a very long baseline of 2300 km. The sensitivity of the experiment can be maximised by optimising the energy spectra of the neutrino and anti-neutrino fluxes. Such an optimisation requires exploring an extended range of parameters describing in details the geometries and properties of the primary protons, hadron target and focusing elements in the neutrino beam line. In this paper we present a numerical solution that leads to an optimised energy spectra and study its impact on the sensitivity of LBNO to discover leptonic CP violation. In the optimised flux both 1st and 2nd oscillation maxima play an important role in the CP sensitivity. The studies also show that this configuration is less sensitive to systematic errors (e.g. on the total event rates) than an experiment which mainly relies on the neutrino-antineutrino asymmetry at the 1st maximum to determine the existence of CP-violation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
LBNO CollaborationS. K. AgarwallaL. AgostinoM. AittolaA. AlekouB. AndrieuF. AntoniouR. AsfandiyarovD. AutieroO. BésidaA. BalikP. BallettI. BandacD. BanerjeeW. BartmannF. BayB. BiskupA. M. Blebea-ApostuA. BlondelM. BogomilovS. BolognesiE. BorrielloI. BrancusA. BravarM. Buizza-AvanziniD. CaiuloM. CalinM. CalvianiM. CampanelliC. CantiniG. Cata-DanilS. ChakrabortyN. CharitonidisL. ChaussardD. ChesneanuF. ChipesiuP. CrivelliJ. DawsonI. De BonisY. DeclaisP. Del Amo SanchezA. DelbartS. Di~LuiseD. DuchesneauJ. DumarchezI. EfthymiopoulosA. EliseevS. EmeryT. EnqvistK. EnqvistL. EpprechtA. N. ErykalovT. EsanuD. FrancoM. FriendV. GalymovG. GavrilovA. GendottiC. GigantiS. GilardoniB. GoddardC. M. GomoiuY. A. GornushkinP. GorodetzkyA. HaeslerT. HasegawaS. HorikawaK. HuituA. IzmaylovA. JipaK. KainulainenY. KaradzhovM. KhabibullinA. KhotjantsevA. N. KopylovA. KorzenevS. KosyanenkoD. KrynY. KudenkoP. KuusiniemiI. LazanuC. LazaridisJ. -M. LevyK. LooJ. MaalampiR. M. MargineanuJ. MarteauC. Martin-MariV. MatveevE. MazzucatoA. MefodievO. MineevA. MirizziB. MitricaS. MurphyT. NakadairaS. NaritaD. A. NesterenkoK. NguyenK. NikolicsE. NoahYu. NovikovA. OprimaJ. OsborneT. OvsyannikovaY. PapaphilippouS. PascoliT. PatzakM. PectuE. PennacchioL. PerialeH. PessardB. PopovM. RavonelM. RaynerF. ResnatiO. RisteaA. RobertA. RubbiaK. RummukainenA. SaftoiuK. SakashitaF. Sanchez-GalanJ. SarkamoN. SavianoE. ScantamburloF. SergiampietriD. SgalabernaE. ShaposhnikovaM. SlupeckiD. SmargianakiD. StancaR. SteerenbergA. R. SterianP. SterianS. StoicaC. StrabelJ. SuhonenV. SuvorovG. TomaA. TonazzoW. H. TrzaskaR. TsenovK. TuominenM. ValramG. Vankova-KirilovaF. VannucciG. VasseurF. VelottiP. VeltenV. VenturiT. ViantS. VihonenH. VinckeA. VorobyevA. WeberS. WuN. YershovL. ZambelliM. Zito
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

LBNO CollaborationS. K. AgarwallaL. AgostinoM. AittolaA. AlekouB. AndrieuF. AntoniouR. AsfandiyarovD. AutieroO. BésidaA. BalikP. BallettI. BandacD. BanerjeeW. BartmannF. BayB. BiskupA. M. Blebea-ApostuA. BlondelM. BogomilovS. BolognesiE. BorrielloI. BrancusA. BravarM. Buizza-AvanziniD. CaiuloM. CalinM. CalvianiM. CampanelliC. CantiniG. Cata-DanilS. ChakrabortyN. CharitonidisL. ChaussardD. ChesneanuF. ChipesiuP. CrivelliJ. DawsonI. De BonisY. DeclaisP. Del Amo SanchezA. DelbartS. Di~LuiseD. DuchesneauJ. DumarchezI. EfthymiopoulosA. EliseevS. EmeryT. EnqvistK. EnqvistL. EpprechtA. N. ErykalovT. EsanuD. FrancoM. FriendV. GalymovG. GavrilovA. GendottiC. GigantiS. GilardoniB. GoddardC. M. GomoiuY. A. GornushkinP. GorodetzkyA. HaeslerT. HasegawaS. HorikawaK. HuituA. IzmaylovA. JipaK. KainulainenY. KaradzhovM. KhabibullinA. KhotjantsevA. N. KopylovA. KorzenevS. KosyanenkoD. KrynY. KudenkoP. KuusiniemiI. LazanuC. LazaridisJ. -M. LevyK. LooJ. MaalampiR. M. MargineanuJ. MarteauC. Martin-MariV. MatveevE. MazzucatoA. MefodievO. MineevA. MirizziB. MitricaS. MurphyT. NakadairaS. NaritaD. A. NesterenkoK. NguyenK. NikolicsE. NoahYu. NovikovA. OprimaJ. OsborneT. OvsyannikovaY. PapaphilippouS. PascoliT. PatzakM. PectuE. PennacchioL. PerialeH. PessardB. PopovM. RavonelM. RaynerF. ResnatiO. RisteaA. RobertA. RubbiaK. RummukainenA. SaftoiuK. SakashitaF. Sanchez-GalanJ. SarkamoN. SavianoE. ScantamburloF. SergiampietriD. SgalabernaE. ShaposhnikovaM. SlupeckiD. SmargianakiD. StancaR. SteerenbergA. R. SterianP. SterianS. StoicaC. StrabelJ. SuhonenV. SuvorovG. TomaA. TonazzoW. H. TrzaskaR. TsenovK. TuominenM. ValramG. Vankova-KirilovaF. VannucciG. VasseurF. VelottiP. VeltenV. VenturiT. ViantS. VihonenH. VinckeA. VorobyevA. WeberS. WuN. YershovL. ZambelliM. Zito

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.