Abstract

We give a complete answer to the following basic question: "What is the maximal fraction of deletions or insertions tolerable by qq-ary list-decodable codes with non-vanishing information rate?" This question has been open even for binary codes, including the restriction to the binary insertion-only setting, where the best-known result was that a γ≤0.707γ\leq 0.707 fraction of insertions is tolerable by some binary code family. For any desired ε>0ε> 0, we construct a family of binary codes of positive rate which can be efficiently list-decoded from any combination of γγ fraction of insertions and δδ fraction of deletions as long as γ+2δ≤1−ε γ+2δ\leq 1-ε. On the other hand, for any γ,δγ,δ with γ+2δ=1γ+2δ=1 list-decoding is impossible. Our result thus precisely characterizes the feasibility region of binary list-decodable codes for insertions and deletions. We further generalize our result to codes over any finite alphabet of size qq. Surprisingly, our work reveals that the feasibility region for q>2q>2 is not the natural generalization of the binary bound above. We provide tight upper and lower bounds that precisely pin down the feasibility region, which turns out to have a (q−1)(q-1)-piece-wise linear boundary whose qq corner-points lie on a quadratic curve. The main technical work in our results is proving the existence of code families of sufficiently large size with good list-decoding properties for any combination of δ,γδ,γ within the claimed feasibility region. We achieve this via an intricate analysis of codes introduced by [Bukh, Ma; SIAM J. Discrete Math; 2014]. Finally, we give a simple yet powerful concatenation scheme for list-decodable insertion-deletion codes which transforms any such (non-efficient) code family (with vanishing information rate) into an efficiently decodable code family with constant rate.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.