Paper detail

Optimal Trispectrum Estimators and WMAP Constraints

We present an implementation of an optimal CMB trispectrum estimator which accounts for anisotropic noise and incomplete sky coverage. We use a general separable mode expansion which can and has been applied to constrain both primordial and late-time models. We validate our methods on large angular scales using known analytic results in the Sachs-Wolfe limit. We present the first near-optimal trispectrum constraints from WMAP data on the cubic term of local model inflation $ g_{\rm NL} = (1.6 \pm 7.0)\times 10^5$, for the equilateral model $t_{\rm NL}^{\rm{equil}}=(-3.11\pm 7.5)\times 10^6 $ and for the constant model $t_{\rm NL}^{\rm{const}}=(-1.33\pm 3.62)$. These results, particularly the equilateral constraint, are relevant to a number of well-motivated models (such as DBI and K-inflation) with closely correlated trispectrum shapes. We also use the trispectrum signal predicted for cosmic strings to provide a conservative upper limit on the string tension $Gμ\le 1.1\times 10^{-6}$ (at 95% confidence), which is largely background and model independent. All these new trispectrum results are consistent with a Gaussian Universe. We discuss the importance of constraining general classes of trispectra using these methods and the prospects for higher precision with the Planck satellite.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.