Paper detail

Optimal Therapy of Hepatitis C Dynamics and Sampling Based Analysis

We examine two models for hepatitis C viral (HCV) dynamics, one for monotherapy with interferon (IFN) and the other for combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin. Optimal therapy for both the models is determined using the steepest gradient method, by defining an objective functional which minimizes the infected hepatocyte levels, virion population and the side-effects of the drug(s). The optimal therapy for both the models shows an initial period of high efficacy, followed by a gradual decline. The period of high efficacy coincides with a significant decrease in the infected hepatocyte levels as well as viral load, whereas the efficacy drops after liver regeneration through restored hepatocyte levels. The period of high efficacy is not altered significantly when the cost coefficients are varied, as long as the side effects are relatively small. This suggests a higher dependence of the optimal therapy on the model parameters in case of drugs with minimal side effects. We use the Latin hypercube sampling technique to randomly generate a large number of patient scenarios (i.e, model parameter sets) and study the dynamics of each set under the optimal therapy already determined. Results show an increase in the percentage of responders (as indicated by drop in viral load below detection levels) in case of combination therapy as compared to monotherapy. Statistical tests performed to study the correlations between sample parameters and the time required for the viral load to fall below detection level, show a strong monotonic correlation with the death rate of infected hepatocytes, identifying it to be an important factor in deciding individual drug regimens.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.