Paper detail

Optimal Stencils in Sobolev Spaces

This paper proves that the approximation of pointwise derivatives of order $s$ of functions in Sobolev space $W_2^m(\R^d)$ by linear combinations of function values cannot have a convergence rate better than $m-s-d/2$, no matter how many nodes are used for approximation and where they are placed. These convergence rates are attained by {\em scalable} approximations that are exact on polynomials of order at least $\lfloor m-d/2\rfloor +1$, proving that the rates are optimal for given $m,\,s,$ and $d$. And, for a fixed node set $X\subset\R^d$, the convergence rate in any Sobolev space $W_2^m(Ω)$ cannot be better than $q-s$ where $q$ is the maximal possible order of polynomial exactness of approximations based on $X$, no matter how large $m$ is. In particular,scalable stencil constructions via polyharmonic kernels are shown to realize the optimal convergence rates, and good approximations of their error in Sobolev space can be calculated via their error in Beppo-Levi spaces. This allows to construct near-optimal stencils in Sobolev spaces stably and efficiently, for use in meshless methods to solve partial differential equations via generalized finite differences (RBF-FD). Numerical examples are included for illustration.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.