Paper detail

Optimal searching of gapped repeats in a word

Following (Kolpakov et al., 2013; Gawrychowski and Manea, 2015), we continue the study of {\em $α$-gapped repeats} in strings, defined as factors $uvu$ with $|uv|\leq α|u|$. Our main result is the $O(αn)$ bound on the number of {\em maximal} $α$-gapped repeats in a string of length $n$, previously proved to be $O(α^2 n)$ in (Kolpakov et al., 2013). For a closely related notion of maximal $δ$-subrepetition (maximal factors of exponent between $1+δ$ and $2$), our result implies the $O(n/δ)$ bound on their number, which improves the bound of (Kolpakov et al., 2010) by a $\log n$ factor. We also prove an algorithmic time bound $O(αn+S)$ ($S$ size of the output) for computing all maximal $α$-gapped repeats. Our solution, inspired by (Gawrychowski and Manea, 2015), is different from the recently published proof by (Tanimura et al., 2015) of the same bound. Together with our bound on $S$, this implies an $O(αn)$-time algorithm for computing all maximal $α$-gapped repeats.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.