Paper detail

Optimal sampling ratios in comparative diagnostic trials

In this paper we focus on comparative diagnostic trials which are frequently employed to compare two markers with continuous or ordinal results. We derive explicit expressions for the optimal sampling ratio based on a common variance structure shared by existing summary statistics of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Estimating the optimal ratio requires either pilot data or parametric model assumptions; however, pilot data are often unavailable at the planning stage of diagnostic trials. In the absence of pilot data, some distributions have to be assumed for carrying out the calculation. An optimal ratio from an incorrect distributional assumption may lead to an underpowered study. We propose a two-stage procedure to adaptively estimate the optimal ratio in comparative diagnostic trials without pilot data or assuming parametric distributions. We illustrate the properties of the proposed method through theoretical proofs and extensive simulation studies. We use an example in cancer diagnostic studies to illustrate the application of our method. We find that our method increases the power, or reduces the required overall sample size dramatically.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.