Paper detail

Optimal results for the fractional heat equation involving the Hardy potential

In this paper we study the influence of the Hardy potential in the fractional heat equation. In particular, we consider the problem $$(P_θ)\quad \left\{ \begin{array}{rcl} u_t+(-Δ)^{s} u&=&ł\dfrac{\,u}{|x|^{2s}}+θu^p+ c f\mbox{ in } Ω\times (0,T),\\ u(x,t)&>&0\inn Ω\times (0,T),\\ u(x,t)&=&0\inn (\ren\setminusΩ)\times[ 0,T),\\ u(x,0)&=&u_0(x) \mbox{ if }x\inØ, \end{array} \right. $$ where $N> 2s$, $0<s<1$, $(-Δ)^s$ is the fractional Laplacian of order $2s$, $p>1$, $c,ł>0$, $u_0\ge 0$, $f\ge 0$ are in a suitable class of functions and $θ=\{0,1\}$. Notice that $(P_0)$ is a linear problem, while $(P_1)$ is a semilinear problem. The main features in the article are: \begin{enumerate} \item Optimal results about \emph{existence} and \emph{instantaneous and complete blow up} in the linear problem $(P_0)$, where the best constant $Λ_{N,s}$ in the fractional Hardy inequality provides the threshold between existence and nonexistence. Similar results in the local heat equation were obtained by Baras and Goldstein in \cite{BaGo}. However, in the fractional setting the arguments are much more involved and they require the proof of a weak Harnack inequality for a weighted operator that appear in a natural way. Once this Harnack inequality is obtained, the optimal results follow as a simpler consequence than in the classical case. \item The existence of a critical power $p_+(s,λ)$ in the semilinear problem $(P_1)$ such that: \begin{enumerate} \item If $p> p_+(s,λ)$, the problem has no weak positive supersolutions and a phenomenon of \emph{complete and instantaneous blow up} happens. \item If $p< p_+(s,λ)$, there exists a positive solution for a suitable class of nonnegative data. \end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.