Paper detail

Optimal Reliability in Design for Fatigue Life

The failure of a component often is the result of a degradation process that originates with the formation of a crack. Fatigue describes the crack formation in the material under cyclic loading. Activation and deactivation operations of technical units are important examples in engineering where fatigue and especially low-cycle fatigue (LCF) play an essential role. A significant scatter in fatigue life for many materials results in the necessity of advanced probabilistic models for fatigue. Moreover, optimization of reliability is of vital interest in engineering, where with respect to fatigue the cost functionals are motivated by the predicted probability for the integrity of the component after a certain number of load cycles. The natural mathematical language to model failure, here understood as crack initiation, is the language of spatio-temporal point processes and their first failure times. This translates the problem of optimal reliability in the framework of shape optimization. The cost functionals derived in this way for realistic optimal reliability problems are too singular to be $H^1$-lower semi-continuous as many damage mechanisms, like LCF, lead to crack initiation as a function of the stress at the component's surface. Realistic crack formation models therefore impose a new challenge to the theory of shape optimization. In this work, we have to modify the existence proof of optimal shapes, for the case of sufficiently smooth shapes using elliptic regularity, uniform Schauder estimates and compactness of strong solutions via the Arzela-Ascoli theorem. This result applies to a variety of crack initiation models and in particular applies to a recent probabilistic model for LCF.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.