Paper detail

Optimal reconstruction of the folding landscape using differential energy surface analysis

In experiments and in simulations, the free energy of a state of a system can be determined from the probability that the state is occupied. However, it is often necessary to impose a biasing potential on the system so that high energy states are sampled with sufficient frequency. The unbiased energy is typically obtained from the data using the weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM). Here we present differential energy surface analysis (DESA), in which the gradient of the energy surface, dE/dx, is extracted from data taken with a series of harmonic biasing potentials. It is shown that DESA produces a maximum likelihood estimate of the folding landscape gradient. DESA is demonstrated by analyzing data from a simulated system as well as data from a single-molecule unfolding experiment in which the end-to-end distance of a DNA hairpin is measured. It is shown that the energy surface obtained from DESA is indistinguishable from the energy surface obtained when WHAM is applied to the same data. Two criteria are defined which indicate whether the DESA results are self-consistent. It is found that these criteria can detect a situation where the energy is not a single-valued function of the measured reaction coordinate. The criteria were found to be satisfied for the experimental data analyzed, confirming that end-to-end distance is a good reaction coordinate for the experimental system. The combination of DESA and the optical trap assay in which a structure is disrupted under harmonic constraint facilitates an extremely accurate measurement of the folding energy surface.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.