Paper detail

Optimal Reconstruction Codes for Deletion Channels

The sequence reconstruction problem, introduced by Levenshtein in 2001, considers a communication scenario where the sender transmits a codeword from some codebook and the receiver obtains multiple noisy reads of the codeword. Motivated by modern storage devices, we introduced a variant of the problem where the number of noisy reads $N$ is fixed (Kiah et al. 2020). Of significance, for the single-deletion channel, using $\log_2\log_2 n +O(1)$ redundant bits, we designed a reconstruction code of length $n$ that reconstructs codewords from two distinct noisy reads. In this work, we show that $\log_2\log_2 n -O(1)$ redundant bits are necessary for such reconstruction codes, thereby, demonstrating the optimality of our previous construction. Furthermore, we show that these reconstruction codes can be used in $t$-deletion channels (with $t\ge 2$) to uniquely reconstruct codewords from $n^{t-1}+O\left(n^{t-2}\right)$ distinct noisy reads.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.