Paper detail

Optimal quantitative cryptanalysis of permutation-only multimedia ciphers against plaintext attacks

Recently, an image scrambling encryption algorithm of pixel bit based on chaos map was proposed. Considering the algorithm as a typical binary image scrambling/permutation algorithm exerting on plaintext of size $M\times (8N)$, this paper proposes a novel optimal method to break it with some known/chosen-plaintexts. The spatial complexity and computational complexity of the attack are only $O(32\cdot MN)$ and $O(16\cdot n_0\cdot MN)$ respectively, where $n_0$ is the number of known/chosen-plaintexts used. The method can be easily extended to break any permutation-only encryption scheme exerting on plaintext of size $M\times N$ and with $L$ different levels of values. The corresponding spatial complexity and computational complexity are only $O(MN)$ and $O(\lceil\log_L(MN)\rceil \cdot MN)$ respectively. In addition, some specific remarks on the performance of the image scrambling encryption algorithm are presented.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.