Paper detail

Optimal PSF modeling for weak lensing: complexity and sparsity

We investigate the impact of point spread function (PSF) fitting errors on cosmic shear measurements using the concepts of complexity and sparsity. Complexity, introduced in a previous paper, characterizes the number of degrees of freedom of the PSF. For instance, fitting an underlying PSF with a model with low complexity will lead to small statistical errors on the model parameters, however these parameters could suffer from large biases. Alternatively, fitting with a large number of parameters will tend to reduce biases at the expense of statistical errors. We perform an optimisation of scatters and biases by studying the mean squared error of a PSF model. We also characterize a model sparsity, which describes how efficiently the model is able to represent the underlying PSF using a limited number of free parameters. We present the general case and illustrate it for a realistic example of PSF fitted with shapelet basis sets. We derive the relation between complexity and sparsity of the PSF model, signal-to-noise ratio of stars and systematic errors on cosmological parameters. With the constraint of maintaining the systematics below the statistical uncertainties, this lead to a relation between the required number of stars to calibrate the PSF and the sparsity. We discuss the impact of our results for current and future cosmic shear surveys. In the typical case where the biases can be represented as a power law of the complexity, we show that current weak lensing surveys can calibrate the PSF with few stars, while future surveys will require hard constraints on the sparsity in order to calibrate the PSF with 50 stars.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.