Abstract

A collection of sets satisfies a (δ,ε)(δ,\varepsilon)-proximity gap with respect to some property if for every set in the collection, either (i) all members of the set are δδ-close to the property in (relative) Hamming distance, or (ii) only a small ε\varepsilon-fraction of members are δδ-close to the property. In a seminal work, Ben-Sasson \textit{et al.}\ showed that the collection of affine subspaces exhibits a (δ,ε)(δ,\varepsilon)-proximity gap with respect to the property of being Reed--Solomon (RS) codewords with δδ up to the so-called Johnson bound for list decoding. Their technique relies on the Guruswami--Sudan list decoding algorithm for RS codes, which is guaranteed to work in the Johnson bound regime. Folded Reed--Solomon (FRS) codes are known to achieve the optimal list decoding radius δδ, a regime known as capacity. Moreover, a rich line of list decoding algorithms was developed for FRS codes. It is then natural to ask if FRS codes can be shown to exhibit an analogous (δ,ε)(δ,\varepsilon)-proximity gap, but up to the so-called optimal capacity regime. We answer this question in the affirmative (and the framework naturally applies more generally to suitable subspace-design codes). An additional motivation to understand proximity gaps for FRS codes is the recent results [BCDZ'25] showing that they exhibit properties similar to random linear codes, which were previously shown to be related to properties of RS codes with random evaluation points in [LMS'25], as well as codes over constant-size alphabet based on AEL [JS'25].

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.