Paper detail

Optimal post-processing for a generic single-shot qubit readout

We analyze three different post-processing methods applied to a single-shot qubit readout: the average-signal (boxcar filter), peak-signal, and maximum-likelihood methods. In contrast to previous work, we account for a stochastic turn-on time $t_i$ associated with the leading edge of a pulse signaling one of the qubit states. This model is relevant to spin-qubit readouts based on spin-to-charge conversion and would be generically reached in the limit of large signal-to-noise ratio $r$ for several other physical systems, including fluorescence-based readouts of ion-trap qubits and nitrogen-vacancy center spins. We derive analytical closed-form expressions for the conditional probability distributions associated with the peak-signal and boxcar filters. For the boxcar filter, we find an asymptotic scaling of the single-shot error rate $\varepsilon \sim \ln r/\sqrt{r}$ when $t_i$ is stochastic, in contrast to the result $\varepsilon \sim \ln r/ r$ for deterministic $t_i$. Consequently, the peak-signal method outperforms the boxcar filter significantly when $t_i$ is stochastic, but is only marginally better for deterministic $t_i$ (a result that is consistent with the widespread use of the boxcar filter for fluorescence-based readouts and the peak-signal for spin-to-charge conversion). We generalize the theoretically optimal maximum-likelihood method to stochastic $t_i$ and show numerically that a stochastic turn-on time $t_i$ will always result in a larger single-shot error rate. Based on this observation, we propose a general strategy to improve the quality of single-shot readouts by forcing $t_i$ to be deterministic.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.