Paper detail

Optimal Planar Range Skyline Reporting with Linear Space in External Memory

Let P be a set of n points in R^2. Given a rectangle Q = [α_1, α_2] x [β_1, β_2], a range skyline query returns the maxima of the points in P \cap Q. An important variant is the so-called top-open queries, where Q is a 3-sided rectangle whose upper edge is grounded at y = \infty (that is, β_2 = \infty). These queries are crucial in numerous database applications. In internal memory, extensive research has been devoted to designing data structures that can answer such queries efficiently. In contrast, currently there is no clear understanding about their exact complexities in external memory. This paper presents several structures of linear size for answering the above queries with the optimal I/O cost. We show that a top-open query can be solved in O(log_B(n) + k/B) I/Os, where B is the block size and k is the number of points in the query result. The query cost can be made O(log log_B(U) + k/B) when the data points lie in a U x U grid for some integer U >= n, and further lowered to O(1 + k/B) if U = O(n). The same efficiency also applies to 3-sided queries where Q is a right-open rectangle. However, the hardness of the problem increases if Q is a left- or bottom-open 3-sided rectangle. We prove that any linear-size structure must perform Ω((n/B)^\eps + k/B) I/Os to solve such a query in the worst case, where \eps > 0 can be an arbitrarily small constant. In fact, left- and right-open queries are just as difficult as general (4-sided) queries, for which we give a linear-size structure with query time O((n/B)^\eps + k/B). Interestingly, this indicates that 4-sided range skyline queries have exactly the same hardness as 4-sided range reporting (where the goal is to report simply the whole P \cap Q). That is, the skyline requirement does not alter the problem difficulty at all.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.